Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 20.1 (19.6, 20.5) N/A 1,620 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 22.5 (22.4, 22.5) N/A 83,836 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 2.7)
Shelby County 6 10.4 (9.5, 11.4) 81 (71, 81) 103 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.8, 3.2)
Lauderdale County 6 10.8 (6.1, 17.8) 80 (39, 81) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.4)
Obion County 6 11.4 (7.2, 17.3) 79 (44, 81) 5 falling falling trend -29.9 (-56.9, -1.8)
Gibson County 6 11.4 (7.8, 16.3) 78 (48, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.5, 6.5)
Dyer County 6 11.9 (7.7, 17.6) 77 (42, 81) 5
*
*
McNairy County 6 12.0 (7.1, 19.1) 76 (32, 81) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.4, 4.9)
Hardin County 6 12.0 (7.2, 19.0) 75 (33, 81) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.5, 2.9)
Montgomery County 6 12.4 (10.1, 15.0) 74 (55, 81) 21 falling falling trend -2.8 (-14.0, -0.4)
Carroll County 6 12.5 (8.0, 19.0) 73 (33, 81) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.6)
Bedford County 6 12.6 (8.8, 17.6) 72 (40, 81) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.5, 2.2)
Hickman County 6 13.0 (7.7, 20.8) 71 (25, 81) 4
*
*
Davidson County 6 13.3 (12.1, 14.7) 70 (57, 77) 93 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 0.5)
Madison County 6 13.6 (10.8, 17.0) 69 (46, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.6)
Hardeman County 6 13.8 (8.7, 21.2) 68 (23, 81) 5
*
*
Giles County 6 14.0 (9.1, 20.9) 67 (27, 81) 6
*
*
Haywood County 6 14.0 (7.8, 23.7) 66 (15, 81) 3
*
*
Henderson County 6 14.0 (8.8, 21.4) 65 (21, 81) 5 stable stable trend 21.7 (-3.2, 49.5)
Rutherford County 6 14.7 (12.8, 16.8) 64 (49, 77) 44 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.4)
Coffee County 6 15.3 (11.4, 20.3) 63 (30, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 5.4)
Maury County 6 16.4 (13.1, 20.2) 62 (32, 76) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 3.1)
Wilson County 6 16.4 (13.7, 19.5) 61 (34, 74) 27 falling falling trend -13.8 (-25.9, -0.4)
Grundy County 6 16.7 (9.5, 28.1) 60 (3, 81) 3
*
*
Macon County 6 17.5 (10.8, 26.8) 59 (5, 81) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.9)
Lincoln County 6 17.5 (12.3, 24.4) 58 (15, 80) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 7.5)
Cocke County 6 17.6 (12.6, 24.0) 57 (16, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.8, 5.4)
Stewart County 6 17.6 (10.3, 28.9) 56 (3, 81) 4
*
*
Meigs County 6 17.7 (10.1, 29.8) 55 (3, 81) 3
*
*
Johnson County 6 17.8 (11.0, 27.9) 54 (5, 81) 5
*
*
Union County 6 18.1 (11.2, 27.9) 53 (5, 81) 5 stable stable trend -25.4 (-50.5, 2.0)
Tipton County 6 18.2 (13.8, 23.6) 52 (17, 77) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.0, 8.1)
Morgan County 6 18.5 (11.9, 27.7) 51 (6, 81) 5
*
*
Polk County 6 18.5 (11.5, 28.8) 50 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.4)
Campbell County 6 18.6 (13.6, 24.9) 49 (13, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.3, 6.7)
DeKalb County 6 18.7 (11.7, 28.5) 48 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.0, 6.8)
Claiborne County 6 18.8 (13.2, 26.2) 47 (11, 79) 8 falling falling trend -8.3 (-33.9, -1.5)
Marshall County 6 18.9 (13.4, 26.1) 46 (8, 80) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.6, 0.7)
Cheatham County 6 19.0 (13.6, 26.0) 45 (7, 79) 9
*
*
Scott County 6 19.0 (11.9, 28.9) 44 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.2)
Bradley County 6 19.1 (15.8, 22.9) 43 (19, 69) 25 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 5.0)
Marion County 6 19.2 (13.3, 27.0) 42 (7, 79) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 5.0)
Humphreys County 6 20.2 (12.8, 30.6) 41 (2, 81) 5 stable stable trend -7.5 (-23.8, 0.2)
Smith County 6 20.3 (12.7, 30.8) 40 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.0, 9.0)
Fentress County 6 20.4 (12.5, 31.5) 39 (2, 81) 5
*
*
Franklin County 6 20.5 (15.5, 26.8) 38 (9, 72) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 6.3)
Henry County 6 20.6 (14.7, 28.2) 37 (3, 77) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 9.2)
Anderson County 6 21.0 (17.0, 25.7) 36 (13, 64) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-28.4, 13.4)
Dickson County 6 21.2 (16.3, 27.2) 35 (7, 69) 13 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.3, 8.4)
Sumner County 6 21.3 (18.6, 24.3) 34 (18, 55) 46 stable stable trend -2.4 (-11.3, 0.7)
Cannon County 6 22.1 (12.8, 35.6) 33 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -38.7 (-67.6, 1.5)
Putnam County 6 22.5 (18.3, 27.4) 32 (8, 61) 21 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.8, 8.2)
Lawrence County 6 22.7 (17.2, 29.5) 31 (3, 67) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 6.9)
Williamson County 6 22.8 (20.1, 25.6) 30 (14, 50) 58 stable stable trend -1.0 (-21.0, 12.1)
Robertson County 6 22.8 (18.2, 28.2) 29 (5, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.8)
Benton County 6 22.8 (13.9, 35.5) 28 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.9, 7.5)
Hamilton County 6 23.1 (21.1, 25.3) 27 (16, 44) 104 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.5, -0.1)
White County 6 23.3 (16.5, 32.2) 26 (2, 73) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.6, 6.4)
Overton County 6 23.4 (16.0, 33.3) 25 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-6.4, 9.6)
Fayette County 6 24.2 (18.6, 31.2) 24 (2, 63) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 5.6)
Bledsoe County 6 24.3 (15.6, 36.9) 23 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Roane County 6 24.5 (19.6, 30.4) 22 (2, 56) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.8)
Carter County 6 25.5 (20.4, 31.5) 21 (2, 53) 20 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.8, 9.0)
Warren County 6 25.8 (19.7, 33.2) 20 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.1, 8.2)
Weakley County 6 26.0 (19.2, 34.6) 19 (1, 63) 11 rising rising trend 7.2 (3.7, 12.3)
McMinn County 6 26.6 (21.2, 33.1) 18 (1, 51) 18 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.8)
Rhea County 6 26.9 (20.1, 35.5) 17 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.5, 6.7)
Chester County 6 27.0 (17.1, 40.5) 16 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Monroe County 6 27.1 (21.5, 33.9) 15 (1, 51) 18 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.8, 7.5)
Hamblen County 6 27.2 (22.1, 33.2) 14 (1, 46) 21 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.6, -0.6)
Sequatchie County 6 27.4 (17.6, 41.1) 13 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Hawkins County 6 28.2 (22.9, 34.3) 12 (1, 44) 22 falling falling trend -7.0 (-22.6, -1.4)
Sullivan County 6 28.5 (25.3, 31.9) 11 (2, 29) 66 stable stable trend -3.1 (-12.9, 3.5)
Unicoi County 6 28.7 (19.7, 40.9) 10 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-13.1, 3.4)
Knox County 6 28.9 (26.9, 31.1) 9 (3, 23) 157 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 2.1)
Cumberland County 6 29.1 (24.1, 35.0) 8 (1, 37) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-16.7, 3.0)
Greene County 6 29.3 (24.3, 35.1) 7 (1, 38) 27 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.7, 6.2)
Sevier County 6 30.0 (25.7, 34.9) 6 (1, 30) 38 stable stable trend 0.2 (-14.8, 7.9)
Washington County 6 30.3 (26.5, 34.5) 5 (1, 26) 50 stable stable trend -1.6 (-15.7, 3.2)
Jefferson County 6 31.1 (25.4, 37.8) 4 (1, 33) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-13.7, 5.4)
Grainger County 6 31.9 (22.8, 43.6) 3 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.3, 6.6)
Loudon County 6 31.9 (26.5, 38.3) 2 (1, 30) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.5)
Blount County 6 34.1 (30.3, 38.4) 1 (1, 15) 62 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 2.8)
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/15/2024 10:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top