Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 30.1 (29.3, 31.0) N/A 1,108 rising rising trend 3.4 (3.1, 3.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 22.5 (22.4, 22.5) N/A 83,836 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 2.7)
Polk County 7 24.5 (22.6, 26.6) 65 (46, 71) 124 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.0, 9.4)
Linn County 7 32.6 (29.5, 36.0) 32 (18, 51) 84 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.7, 4.2)
Scott County 7 32.1 (28.6, 35.9) 34 (18, 55) 65 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.2, 4.8)
Dubuque County 7 41.8 (36.4, 47.8) 13 (5, 34) 47 rising rising trend 5.2 (4.2, 6.5)
Johnson County 7 34.3 (29.9, 39.2) 26 (12, 54) 46 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.8, 4.8)
Black Hawk County 7 29.4 (25.4, 33.8) 44 (22, 65) 43 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.8, 3.5)
Woodbury County 7 30.8 (26.2, 36.0) 40 (16, 65) 34 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.4, 4.8)
Cerro Gordo County 7 47.0 (38.8, 56.4) 7 (1, 30) 28 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.7, 7.2)
Pottawattamie County 7 24.9 (20.7, 29.7) 63 (33, 75) 27 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.7, 5.7)
Dallas County 7 26.6 (22.0, 31.9) 57 (27, 73) 24 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 4.6)
Story County 7 25.8 (21.0, 31.2) 60 (28, 74) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.9)
Clinton County 7 36.7 (29.7, 44.9) 19 (6, 57) 22 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.6, 4.5)
Sioux County 7 56.1 (45.2, 68.7) 2 (1, 19) 20 rising rising trend 5.1 (3.5, 7.5)
Des Moines County 7 32.8 (25.9, 41.2) 30 (9, 68) 17 rising rising trend 4.9 (3.4, 7.2)
Plymouth County 7 49.5 (38.6, 62.6) 6 (1, 36) 16
*
*
Warren County 7 26.6 (20.8, 33.5) 58 (22, 75) 15 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 4.2)
Jasper County 7 32.4 (25.2, 41.1) 33 (9, 69) 15 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.8, 4.7)
Benton County 7 41.6 (32.0, 53.4) 14 (1, 53) 14
*
*
Dickinson County 7 56.4 (42.6, 73.7) 1 (1, 30) 14 rising rising trend 21.2 (5.3, 34.7)
Muscatine County 7 28.2 (21.7, 36.1) 51 (16, 74) 14 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.5)
Lee County 7 31.5 (23.9, 40.9) 36 (9, 72) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 5.6)
Marshall County 7 27.2 (20.7, 35.2) 55 (16, 76) 13 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 4.0)
Webster County 7 27.5 (20.9, 35.5) 54 (16, 76) 13 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.9)
Bremer County 7 37.7 (28.5, 49.2) 18 (4, 65) 12 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 5.2)
Marion County 7 31.2 (23.4, 40.8) 38 (8, 72) 12 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.2, 6.7)
Boone County 7 30.9 (22.9, 41.0) 39 (9, 73) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 4.1)
Delaware County 7 52.8 (38.4, 70.8) 5 (1, 44) 10 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.9, 8.5)
Winneshiek County 7 45.2 (32.5, 61.2) 8 (1, 58) 10
*
*
Jackson County 7 40.1 (28.8, 54.5) 16 (1, 65) 10
*
*
Carroll County 7 34.9 (24.5, 48.3) 25 (4, 73) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.2, 7.0)
Jones County 7 32.8 (23.1, 45.4) 31 (5, 76) 9 stable stable trend -20.2 (-38.8, 0.9)
Cedar County 7 35.2 (24.8, 48.7) 23 (3, 72) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.9)
Fayette County 7 33.5 (23.3, 46.7) 27 (4, 75) 8 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 6.2)
Franklin County 7 56.1 (39.2, 78.4) 3 (1, 39) 8
*
*
Clay County 7 39.4 (27.5, 55.1) 17 (1, 70) 8
*
*
Floyd County 7 36.4 (25.0, 51.5) 20 (2, 72) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-17.7, 4.5)
Butler County 7 33.4 (23.0, 47.6) 28 (4, 75) 8
*
*
Kossuth County 7 42.1 (28.4, 60.3) 12 (1, 70) 8
*
*
Poweshiek County 7 32.9 (22.5, 46.5) 29 (5, 75) 8
*
*
Wapello County 7 17.2 (11.9, 24.1) 78 (47, 78) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.1, 0.6)
Grundy County 7 44.1 (30.1, 62.7) 10 (1, 65) 7
*
*
Allamakee County 7 34.9 (22.7, 51.4) 24 (2, 76) 7
*
*
Henry County 7 28.7 (19.2, 41.2) 47 (8, 78) 7 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 7.5)
Cherokee County 7 36.0 (23.3, 53.8) 22 (2, 75) 6
*
*
Tama County 7 28.9 (18.9, 42.4) 46 (7, 78) 6
*
*
Crawford County 7 27.6 (18.3, 40.2) 53 (10, 78) 6
*
*
Hardin County 7 24.6 (15.5, 37.3) 64 (13, 78) 6 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.4)
Washington County 7 23.0 (14.8, 34.1) 68 (18, 78) 6 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.1, 6.0)
Mahaska County 7 20.5 (13.2, 30.4) 70 (27, 78) 5
*
*
Mitchell County 7 42.9 (27.2, 64.5) 11 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Page County 7 24.0 (15.4, 36.1) 67 (14, 78) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.8)
Hancock County 7 36.3 (22.8, 55.3) 21 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Iowa County 7 25.1 (15.8, 37.9) 62 (10, 78) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 7 19.3 (12.0, 29.9) 75 (26, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 5.0)
Hamilton County 7 28.5 (17.8, 43.4) 48 (7, 78) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.6)
Buchanan County 7 19.2 (11.9, 29.2) 76 (28, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.0)
Cass County 7 29.6 (17.9, 46.2) 43 (4, 78) 5
*
*
O'Brien County 7 30.1 (18.8, 45.9) 42 (5, 78) 5 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.8)
Palo Alto County 7 45.1 (27.7, 69.6) 9 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Clayton County 7 17.7 (10.6, 28.2) 77 (34, 78) 5
*
*
Guthrie County 7 28.5 (17.6, 44.6) 49 (6, 78) 5
*
*
Sac County 7 31.8 (18.8, 50.9) 35 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.7)
Union County 7 28.5 (17.6, 44.0) 50 (5, 78) 5
*
*
Calhoun County 7 40.1 (23.9, 63.2) 15 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Chickasaw County 7 29.1 (17.4, 45.7) 45 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Harrison County 7 28.0 (17.0, 43.4) 52 (6, 78) 4 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 6.4)
Worth County 7 54.5 (33.1, 84.6) 4 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Buena Vista County 7 19.6 (11.7, 30.7) 74 (24, 78) 4
*
*
Appanoose County 7 21.8 (12.7, 35.5) 69 (13, 78) 4
*
*
Greene County 7 31.3 (18.1, 51.1) 37 (2, 78) 4
*
*
Humboldt County 7 26.2 (15.9, 42.2) 59 (7, 78) 4
*
*
Madison County 7 20.1 (12.1, 31.7) 72 (19, 78) 4
*
*
Lyon County 7 24.1 (13.6, 39.6) 66 (8, 78) 4
*
*
Mills County 7 20.1 (11.6, 32.7) 71 (21, 78) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 7 30.6 (17.2, 50.4) 41 (3, 78) 4
*
*
Winnebago County 7 26.8 (15.2, 44.3) 56 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Monona County 7 25.6 (13.4, 45.0) 61 (6, 78) 3
*
*
Shelby County 7 19.7 (10.3, 34.5) 73 (17, 78) 3
*
*
Adair County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keokuk County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 9:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top