Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 14.1 (14.0, 14.3) N/A 4,067 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.0, 7.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 22.5 (22.4, 22.5) N/A 83,836 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 2.7)
Webb County 7 3.5 (2.5, 4.8) 126 (124, 126) 8 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.3)
Cameron County 7 5.7 (4.7, 6.8) 125 (120, 126) 24 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.0)
Hidalgo County 7 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) 124 (119, 125) 44 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.6)
El Paso County 7 6.2 (5.4, 7.0) 123 (118, 125) 50 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 11.7)
Jim Wells County 7 7.3 (4.1, 12.0) 122 (73, 126) 3
*
*
Nacogdoches County 7 7.4 (4.8, 11.0) 121 (89, 126) 5 falling falling trend -7.4 (-21.3, -3.2)
Bexar County 7 9.1 (8.5, 9.7) 120 (109, 122) 176 stable stable trend 5.6 (-2.4, 11.2)
Houston County 7 10.0 (5.5, 17.0) 119 (35, 126) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.1, 4.0)
Rusk County 7 10.1 (6.8, 14.4) 118 (58, 125) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 4.0)
Nueces County 7 10.1 (8.7, 11.7) 117 (91, 121) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Anderson County 7 10.3 (7.2, 14.5) 116 (56, 125) 7
*
*
Matagorda County 7 10.5 (6.6, 16.0) 115 (41, 125) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.7)
Ector County 7 10.7 (8.3, 13.5) 114 (67, 122) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.2)
Smith County 7 10.7 (9.0, 12.6) 113 (79, 121) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.1)
Cherokee County 7 10.8 (7.5, 15.1) 112 (47, 125) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.4)
Hill County 7 11.4 (7.5, 16.9) 111 (34, 125) 6 falling falling trend -20.4 (-45.6, -3.8)
Bastrop County 7 11.6 (8.6, 15.2) 110 (51, 122) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -2.2)
Atascosa County 7 11.6 (7.9, 16.5) 109 (41, 124) 6 rising rising trend 17.4 (2.4, 38.5)
Gregg County 7 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) 108 (56, 121) 17 rising rising trend 8.9 (2.0, 25.8)
Jefferson County 7 11.7 (10.0, 13.7) 107 (68, 119) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Harris County 7 12.0 (11.5, 12.4) 106 (87, 112) 512 stable stable trend 5.7 (-1.1, 11.0)
Liberty County 7 12.0 (8.9, 15.8) 105 (49, 122) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-13.9, 1.0)
Taylor County 7 12.1 (9.7, 14.9) 104 (55, 120) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.5)
Midland County 7 12.2 (9.8, 15.0) 103 (58, 120) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Dallas County 7 12.2 (11.6, 12.9) 102 (84, 111) 292 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
McLennan County 7 12.4 (10.5, 14.5) 101 (64, 117) 33 falling falling trend -7.7 (-18.5, -1.8)
Wilson County 7 12.8 (9.0, 17.9) 100 (32, 122) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.7, 1.7)
Van Zandt County 7 12.8 (9.4, 17.3) 99 (34, 121) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 5.0)
Wharton County 7 12.9 (8.7, 18.5) 98 (25, 122) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.1)
Lubbock County 7 13.1 (11.3, 15.2) 97 (56, 114) 39 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.5)
Hale County 7 13.2 (8.1, 20.2) 96 (18, 125) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.5, 2.6)
Coryell County 7 13.2 (9.4, 17.9) 95 (28, 122) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.7)
Fort Bend County 7 13.2 (12.0, 14.5) 94 (66, 109) 102 stable stable trend 8.5 (-1.6, 16.4)
Medina County 7 13.3 (9.4, 18.3) 93 (26, 122) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.1)
Caldwell County 7 13.5 (9.1, 19.2) 92 (22, 122) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.2, 1.3)
Titus County 7 13.5 (8.6, 20.2) 91 (20, 125) 5
*
*
Bell County 7 13.5 (11.7, 15.5) 90 (56, 113) 43 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Hockley County 7 13.5 (7.8, 21.9) 89 (12, 125) 3
*
*
Angelina County 7 13.7 (10.6, 17.3) 88 (38, 119) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Calhoun County 7 13.7 (8.4, 21.5) 87 (14, 125) 4
*
*
Howard County 7 13.8 (8.9, 20.4) 86 (17, 125) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.1)
Guadalupe County 7 13.8 (11.4, 16.5) 85 (46, 114) 25 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.5)
Brazoria County 7 13.9 (12.2, 15.7) 84 (55, 109) 52 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Hopkins County 7 14.1 (9.4, 20.3) 83 (18, 123) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.5)
Tom Green County 7 14.1 (11.3, 17.3) 82 (40, 117) 19 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.8, -2.0)
Falls County 7 14.1 (8.1, 23.3) 81 (10, 125) 3
*
*
Victoria County 7 14.3 (11.1, 18.1) 80 (33, 118) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.2, 1.8)
Comal County 7 14.4 (12.0, 17.3) 79 (40, 113) 27 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Hunt County 7 14.5 (11.4, 18.1) 78 (31, 117) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.4)
Henderson County 7 14.7 (11.5, 18.6) 77 (29, 117) 16 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.9)
Tyler County 7 14.9 (9.8, 22.5) 76 (14, 122) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 5.0)
Burleson County 7 15.1 (8.5, 25.2) 75 (5, 125) 4
*
*
Red River County 7 15.2 (8.2, 26.8) 74 (4, 125) 3
*
*
Cass County 7 15.2 (9.8, 22.7) 73 (11, 122) 6 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.5, 10.9)
DeWitt County 7 15.2 (9.2, 24.0) 72 (8, 125) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-21.6, 5.1)
San Patricio County 7 15.4 (11.5, 20.1) 71 (21, 119) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.7)
Bowie County 7 15.4 (12.2, 19.3) 70 (25, 113) 16 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.8)
Burnet County 7 15.7 (11.4, 21.3) 69 (17, 120) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.6)
Williamson County 7 15.8 (14.3, 17.4) 68 (44, 89) 89 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 6.9)
Brazos County 7 15.8 (13.2, 18.8) 67 (30, 104) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.3)
Bosque County 7 15.8 (8.8, 26.3) 66 (4, 125) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.4)
Travis County 7 16.0 (14.9, 17.1) 65 (47, 82) 182 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 11.1)
Navarro County 7 16.0 (11.7, 21.5) 64 (16, 118) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 7.6)
Upshur County 7 16.2 (11.7, 21.9) 63 (16, 119) 9 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.1, 6.1)
Jones County 7 16.3 (9.8, 25.8) 62 (8, 125) 4
*
*
Gray County 7 16.5 (10.3, 25.3) 61 (8, 122) 4
*
*
Harrison County 7 16.5 (12.6, 21.4) 60 (17, 112) 13 rising rising trend 21.9 (3.4, 39.7)
Waller County 7 16.8 (12.0, 22.9) 59 (12, 119) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.8, 10.2)
Llano County 7 16.9 (11.0, 25.7) 58 (8, 120) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.7, 3.3)
Lamar County 7 17.1 (12.6, 22.7) 57 (11, 118) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.6)
Fayette County 7 17.3 (11.5, 25.3) 56 (7, 119) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 4.8)
Fannin County 7 17.3 (12.4, 23.7) 55 (11, 117) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.0, 8.0)
Gonzales County 7 17.3 (10.3, 27.3) 54 (5, 122) 4
*
*
Callahan County 7 17.5 (10.3, 28.5) 53 (4, 124) 4
*
*
Walker County 7 17.5 (13.4, 22.5) 52 (16, 113) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 2.4)
Hays County 7 17.6 (15.0, 20.5) 51 (21, 87) 36 stable stable trend 9.6 (-3.5, 19.3)
Milam County 7 17.6 (12.2, 25.1) 50 (9, 120) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.8, 2.6)
Bandera County 7 17.6 (11.6, 26.3) 49 (5, 121) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 5.3)
Wood County 7 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 48 (12, 113) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.8)
Ellis County 7 17.8 (15.1, 20.9) 47 (21, 89) 33 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.1, 7.7)
Jasper County 7 17.9 (12.2, 25.3) 46 (7, 118) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 4.2)
Lavaca County 7 17.9 (10.9, 27.9) 45 (4, 122) 5 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.3, 11.9)
Collin County 7 18.2 (17.0, 19.5) 44 (31, 67) 177 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 4.1)
San Jacinto County 7 18.4 (12.7, 26.0) 43 (6, 116) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 5.2)
Potter County 7 18.7 (15.3, 22.6) 42 (14, 90) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Hardin County 7 18.9 (14.3, 24.5) 41 (10, 106) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.0)
Tarrant County 7 18.9 (18.0, 19.8) 40 (28, 57) 378 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 1.8)
Denton County 7 19.1 (17.8, 20.5) 39 (24, 59) 158 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.6)
Lampasas County 7 19.2 (12.4, 28.7) 38 (4, 120) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.8, 5.9)
Grimes County 7 19.7 (13.5, 28.0) 37 (4, 115) 7
*
*
Rockwall County 7 19.9 (16.2, 24.1) 36 (11, 84) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.9)
Grayson County 7 20.2 (17.2, 23.6) 35 (12, 70) 34 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.5)
Orange County 7 20.2 (16.3, 24.9) 34 (8, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Wise County 7 20.2 (16.0, 25.3) 33 (9, 88) 17 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.5, 6.7)
Palo Pinto County 7 20.3 (13.9, 28.8) 32 (4, 113) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.2)
Camp County 7 20.8 (11.8, 34.3) 31 (1, 122) 4
*
*
Eastland County 7 20.9 (13.1, 31.8) 30 (1, 121) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.3, 6.2)
Kaufman County 7 21.1 (17.6, 25.1) 29 (10, 69) 26 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.6)
Kerr County 7 21.1 (16.4, 26.9) 28 (7, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Brown County 7 21.3 (15.9, 28.0) 27 (5, 105) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.2, 7.8)
Galveston County 7 21.3 (19.2, 23.6) 26 (12, 52) 80 rising rising trend 20.7 (12.1, 27.4)
Randall County 7 21.4 (18.1, 25.1) 25 (9, 65) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Kendall County 7 21.6 (16.5, 27.9) 24 (5, 89) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 1.1)
Montague County 7 21.7 (14.4, 31.6) 23 (2, 119) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.8, 9.2)
Trinity County 7 21.7 (13.0, 34.7) 22 (1, 121) 5
*
*
Gillespie County 7 21.8 (15.0, 30.9) 21 (2, 112) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.3)
Johnson County 7 22.1 (19.1, 25.5) 20 (9, 59) 41 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.5)
Colorado County 7 22.3 (14.4, 33.1) 19 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.9)
Erath County 7 22.4 (16.5, 29.9) 18 (3, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 5.1)
Chambers County 7 22.8 (16.7, 30.5) 17 (3, 99) 10
*
*
Wichita County 7 24.0 (20.4, 28.0) 16 (5, 51) 34 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.9)
Montgomery County 7 25.0 (23.2, 26.9) 15 (8, 28) 155 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 3.1)
Jack County 7 25.7 (14.7, 42.8) 14 (1, 122) 3
*
*
Washington County 7 25.8 (19.4, 33.8) 13 (1, 73) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.8)
Aransas County 7 25.8 (18.7, 35.3) 12 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.7)
Runnels County 7 26.2 (14.9, 43.2) 11 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Austin County 7 28.3 (21.3, 37.1) 10 (1, 61) 12 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.0, 8.7)
Hutchinson County 7 29.4 (20.2, 41.3) 9 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.4, 8.1)
Parker County 7 29.7 (25.9, 33.9) 8 (1, 20) 47 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 6.4)
Cooke County 7 30.4 (23.7, 38.4) 7 (1, 42) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 6.3)
Hood County 7 30.4 (25.4, 36.2) 6 (1, 27) 31 rising rising trend 6.8 (4.2, 17.7)
Polk County 7 32.0 (25.7, 39.4) 5 (1, 27) 22 rising rising trend 9.7 (1.5, 30.1)
Clay County 7 32.9 (20.0, 51.5) 4 (1, 91) 5
*
*
Somervell County 7 34.4 (20.1, 55.5) 3 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Young County 7 34.8 (24.1, 48.8) 2 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.6, 10.5)
Archer County 7 35.3 (20.7, 56.7) 1 (1, 107) 4
*
*
Andrews County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bee County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kleberg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Val Verde County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/15/2024 9:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top