Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 25.8 (25.4, 26.1) N/A 3,682 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.1, 3.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 25.9 (18.5, 35.4) 50 (2, 88) 9 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.9, 9.8)
Allen County 6 Urban 19.4 (16.0, 23.4) 80 (48, 88) 25 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.9)
Ashland County 6 Rural 26.9 (21.3, 33.7) 40 (4, 83) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-20.2, 4.6)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 26.3 (22.3, 30.9) 47 (11, 77) 33 rising rising trend 6.6 (0.2, 17.7)
Athens County 6 Rural 29.3 (23.4, 36.3) 25 (2, 77) 18 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 7.2)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 24.5 (18.9, 31.3) 60 (8, 86) 14 stable stable trend -9.1 (-23.2, 0.4)
Belmont County 6 Urban 27.0 (22.2, 32.7) 39 (6, 80) 24 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 8.3)
Brown County 6 Urban 25.8 (19.9, 32.9) 52 (5, 85) 14 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.0, 6.8)
Butler County 6 Urban 24.6 (22.5, 26.8) 58 (33, 72) 108 rising rising trend 12.5 (4.2, 19.7)
Carroll County 6 Urban 28.6 (20.8, 38.5) 29 (1, 85) 10 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.1, 21.8)
Champaign County 6 Rural 30.7 (24.1, 38.7) 19 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.4)
Clark County 6 Urban 25.2 (21.8, 28.9) 55 (20, 78) 44 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 4.7)
Clermont County 6 Urban 31.0 (27.9, 34.3) 18 (5, 49) 80 rising rising trend 12.2 (7.9, 16.8)
Clinton County 6 Rural 35.6 (28.5, 44.1) 5 (1, 56) 18 rising rising trend 13.7 (6.0, 27.2)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 24.6 (20.9, 28.8) 57 (19, 80) 35 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.6)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 29.0 (22.0, 37.6) 27 (1, 81) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.2, 6.4)
Crawford County 6 Rural 16.7 (11.9, 22.9) 83 (45, 88) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.2)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 20.4 (19.4, 21.5) 78 (64, 82) 330 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.2, 2.4)
Darke County 6 Rural 23.2 (18.0, 29.4) 66 (13, 87) 15 stable stable trend -8.5 (-24.2, 1.2)
Defiance County 6 Rural 16.3 (11.6, 22.4) 86 (52, 88) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 3.7)
Delaware County 6 Urban 29.9 (26.7, 33.3) 23 (7, 54) 69 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.4)
Erie County 6 Urban 34.5 (29.5, 40.1) 8 (1, 46) 39 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.3, 6.0)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 26.9 (23.6, 30.5) 41 (11, 71) 51 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 4.3)
Fayette County 6 Rural 35.1 (26.5, 45.7) 6 (1, 70) 12 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.8, 7.8)
Franklin County 6 Urban 20.8 (19.7, 22.0) 76 (62, 82) 272 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.9, 2.0)
Fulton County 6 Urban 19.4 (14.0, 26.2) 81 (28, 88) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 3.7)
Gallia County 6 Rural 27.5 (20.3, 36.5) 36 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 8.6)
Geauga County 6 Urban 38.1 (33.2, 43.6) 3 (1, 25) 50 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.9, 8.0)
Greene County 6 Urban 27.2 (24.0, 30.8) 38 (13, 69) 56 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.3)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 23.0 (17.2, 30.3) 67 (9, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.3)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 27.4 (25.9, 29.0) 37 (23, 56) 260 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.8, 4.9)
Hancock County 6 Rural 16.3 (12.8, 20.6) 85 (61, 88) 16 falling falling trend -14.1 (-42.0, -1.5)
Hardin County 6 Rural 17.5 (11.7, 25.2) 82 (30, 88) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.1)
Harrison County 6 Rural 24.4 (15.3, 37.4) 61 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural 22.3 (15.5, 31.1) 70 (6, 88) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.8)
Highland County 6 Rural 26.2 (20.0, 33.7) 48 (4, 85) 13 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.8, 9.6)
Hocking County 6 Urban 23.7 (16.7, 32.7) 65 (5, 88) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 6.0)
Holmes County 6 Rural 16.7 (11.6, 23.2) 84 (42, 88) 7 falling falling trend -15.0 (-35.5, -2.7)
Huron County 6 Rural 22.6 (17.9, 28.2) 68 (19, 87) 17 stable stable trend -6.8 (-26.9, 2.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 28.5 (21.1, 37.7) 31 (1, 84) 11
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Urban 26.4 (21.5, 32.2) 44 (7, 81) 23 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.8, 8.1)
Knox County 6 Rural 34.0 (28.0, 40.8) 9 (1, 55) 26 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 6.6)
Lake County 6 Urban 33.0 (30.0, 36.1) 11 (3, 34) 103 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.3, 4.7)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 25.5 (20.4, 31.6) 53 (9, 84) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 4.9)
Licking County 6 Urban 31.9 (28.4, 35.7) 14 (3, 48) 66 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.6, 15.9)
Logan County 6 Rural 30.3 (24.1, 37.7) 20 (1, 76) 18 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.8, 8.8)
Lorain County 6 Urban 25.5 (23.2, 27.9) 54 (27, 70) 102 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 4.1)
Lucas County 6 Urban 21.3 (19.4, 23.2) 74 (54, 82) 108 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 26.6 (20.5, 33.9) 42 (4, 83) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.3)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 20.9 (18.5, 23.5) 75 (51, 84) 65 stable stable trend 8.3 (-8.3, 23.5)
Marion County 6 Rural 15.9 (12.2, 20.4) 87 (63, 88) 13 falling falling trend -6.0 (-12.4, -3.3)
Medina County 6 Urban 32.9 (29.6, 36.5) 12 (3, 38) 77 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.0, 3.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 26.5 (18.8, 36.6) 43 (2, 88) 8 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.2, 10.6)
Mercer County 6 Rural 26.0 (19.9, 33.6) 49 (4, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.8)
Miami County 6 Urban 31.7 (27.4, 36.5) 16 (3, 56) 43 stable stable trend -7.6 (-20.3, 2.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 38.7 (26.1, 55.5) 2 (1, 80) 7 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.4, 12.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 24.0 (22.3, 25.8) 63 (39, 72) 160 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 5.2)
Morgan County 6 Rural 24.5 (15.7, 37.2) 59 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Morrow County 6 Urban 21.6 (15.7, 29.2) 73 (13, 88) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.4)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 31.8 (26.9, 37.3) 15 (2, 60) 33 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.3)
Noble County 6 Rural 20.8 (11.1, 35.5) 77 (2, 88) 4
*
*
Ottawa County 6 Urban 29.1 (23.4, 36.1) 26 (2, 76) 20 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.4, 5.4)
Paulding County 6 Rural 25.8 (17.1, 37.6) 51 (1, 88) 6
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban 32.7 (25.2, 41.8) 13 (1, 77) 14
*
*
Pickaway County 6 Urban 26.3 (21.0, 32.6) 46 (6, 83) 18 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.3, 8.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 37.6 (28.3, 49.1) 4 (1, 67) 12 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.3, 8.7)
Portage County 6 Urban 31.3 (27.7, 35.3) 17 (3, 54) 59 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.9, 6.4)
Preble County 6 Rural 28.1 (21.9, 35.7) 35 (2, 81) 15 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.5, 7.6)
Putnam County 6 Rural 30.3 (23.0, 39.3) 21 (1, 82) 13 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.2, 8.6)
Richland County 6 Urban 21.9 (18.6, 25.6) 72 (35, 85) 34 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.1)
Ross County 6 Rural 34.6 (29.3, 40.6) 7 (1, 49) 33 rising rising trend 6.5 (4.2, 9.4)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 24.6 (19.9, 30.1) 56 (13, 84) 21 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.2, 7.3)
Scioto County 6 Rural 20.4 (16.3, 25.3) 79 (36, 88) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Seneca County 6 Rural 26.4 (20.9, 32.9) 45 (5, 82) 18 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 6.8)
Shelby County 6 Rural 28.2 (22.2, 35.3) 34 (2, 80) 17 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.6, 9.9)
Stark County 6 Urban 29.7 (27.5, 32.1) 24 (10, 47) 145 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.7)
Summit County 6 Urban 28.2 (26.4, 30.2) 33 (18, 54) 191 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.8, 9.7)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 22.4 (19.7, 25.3) 69 (40, 83) 61 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.6)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 28.8 (24.4, 33.7) 28 (5, 70) 34 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.1, 6.9)
Union County 6 Urban 22.0 (17.1, 27.9) 71 (22, 87) 14 falling falling trend -7.9 (-13.6, -4.5)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 24.4 (17.4, 33.3) 62 (5, 88) 9 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 6.2)
Vinton County 6 Rural 28.3 (17.3, 44.0) 32 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Warren County 6 Urban 41.0 (37.6, 44.7) 1 (1, 9) 112 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.0, 6.1)
Washington County 6 Rural 28.5 (23.2, 34.8) 30 (4, 77) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.9)
Wayne County 6 Rural 30.1 (25.9, 34.7) 22 (4, 64) 41 rising rising trend 6.1 (4.8, 7.7)
Williams County 6 Rural 15.9 (11.1, 22.1) 88 (51, 88) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 4.6)
Wood County 6 Urban 33.6 (29.4, 38.3) 10 (2, 43) 49 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.5, 5.2)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 23.8 (16.2, 34.0) 64 (3, 88) 7 rising rising trend 5.5 (2.0, 9.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/12/2024 3:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top