Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Bladder, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 20.3 (20.3, 20.4) 72,640 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 27.7 (26.5, 28.9) 450 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.4, -2.0)
Maine 6,10 *** 27.5 (26.4, 28.6) 508 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.5, 5.9)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 26.7 (26.0, 27.4) 1,174 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 26.6 (25.3, 27.9) 348 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.2, 1.0)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 24.8 (24.4, 25.1) 4,115 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Delaware 6,10 *** 24.5 (23.2, 25.8) 280 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 4.1)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 23.6 (23.1, 24.1) 1,880 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 23.6 (23.2, 24.0) 2,449 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
New York 6,10 *** 23.4 (23.1, 23.7) 5,330 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.0)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 23.3 (22.4, 24.2) 579 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.3, 1.2)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 23.0 (22.5, 23.5) 1,579 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.9)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 22.8 (22.2, 23.4) 1,157 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Vermont 6,10 *** 22.8 (21.3, 24.4) 186 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.3, 4.6)
Michigan 5,10 *** 22.4 # (22.0, 22.8) 2,677 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.2)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 22.3 (20.7, 24.1) 142 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.2, 5.9)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 22.1 (21.5, 22.6) 1,357 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.5, 4.2)
Montana 6,10 *** 22.1 (20.9, 23.3) 289 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.3, 2.7)
Ohio 6,10 *** 21.9 (21.6, 22.3) 3,081 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Iowa 3,8 *** 21.6 (21.0, 22.3) 834 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Washington 5,10 *** 21.6 (21.1, 22.1) 1,641 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Idaho 6,10 *** 21.6 (20.6, 22.6) 379 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.7)
Alaska 6,10 *** 21.6 (19.8, 23.5) 123 stable stable trend -0.7 (-14.5, 15.3)
Illinois 6,10 *** 21.5 (21.1, 21.8) 3,045 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Oregon 6,10 *** 21.5 (20.9, 22.1) 1,031 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Indiana 6,10 *** 21.5 (21.0, 22.0) 1,583 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Kansas 6,10 *** 21.4 (20.7, 22.2) 702 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.9, 3.1)
Maryland 6,10 *** 21.2 (20.7, 21.7) 1,367 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.2, 7.7)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 20.9 (20.0, 21.8) 446 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.2)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 20.8 (19.5, 22.1) 209 stable stable trend -4.9 (-10.4, 1.0)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 20.6 (19.3, 22.1) 172 stable stable trend -6.3 (-14.0, 2.0)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 19.9 (19.6, 20.3) 2,212 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.5)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 19.7 (19.1, 20.2) 1,099 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.2)
Missouri 6,10 *** 19.6 (19.1, 20.0) 1,407 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.5)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 19.3 (18.6, 19.9) 681 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.9)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 19.2 (18.8, 19.7) 1,452 stable stable trend -0.0 (-3.3, 3.3)
Florida 6,10 *** 19.2 (19.0, 19.5) 5,369 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.7, -3.3)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 19.2 (18.6, 19.8) 834 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 4.5)
Arizona 6,10 *** 19.0 (18.6, 19.4) 1,489 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Colorado 6,10 *** 18.7 (18.1, 19.2) 983 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.7)
Alabama 6,10 *** 18.6 (18.1, 19.1) 1,061 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 3.6)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 18.6 (18.0, 19.1) 923 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Georgia 3,8 *** 18.2 (17.8, 18.6) 1,761 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Virginia 6,10 *** 18.0 (17.6, 18.4) 1,599 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
California 3,8 *** 17.4 (17.2, 17.6) 6,749 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.6)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 17.1 (16.5, 17.8) 570 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Utah 3,8 *** 16.8 (16.1, 17.6) 387 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
Texas 6,10 *** 15.2 (14.9, 15.4) 3,665 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.3)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 15.0 (14.3, 15.7) 365 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 13.9 (12.6, 15.3) 85 stable stable trend -10.9 (-22.2, 2.2)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 13.7 (12.9, 14.5) 239 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 9.9 (9.5, 10.4) 447 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.1, 5.4)
Nevada 6 ***
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/17/2018 7:05 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top