Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2018-2022

Alabama Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - fallingfalling - 285,526 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Alabama - fallingfalling - 4,775 133.2 (131.5, 135.0) - -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Blount County 4 stablestable higher 63 146.7 (130.6, 164.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cherokee County 4 stablestable higher 33 163.2 (137.9, 192.4) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Clarke County 4 stablestable higher 36 187.2 (159.6, 218.7) 1.5 7.0 (-0.1, 18.3)
Covington County 4 stablestable higher 51 153.9 (134.6, 175.6) 1.2 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Crenshaw County 4 stablestable higher 18 174.4 (138.3, 218.1) 1.4 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Fayette County 4 stablestable higher 22 179.0 (145.3, 219.0) 1.4 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Franklin County 4 stablestable higher 35 151.7 (129.6, 176.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jackson County 4 stablestable higher 65 153.7 (136.9, 172.4) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Marion County 4 stablestable higher 38 151.5 (130.3, 175.8) 1.2 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Russell County 4 stablestable higher 57 150.2 (132.9, 169.2) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Calhoun County 5 fallingfalling higher 129 151.3 (139.5, 163.9) 1.2 -1.1 (-4.2, -0.7)
Etowah County 5 fallingfalling higher 120 148.9 (136.9, 161.8) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Mobile County 5 fallingfalling higher 405 141.6 (135.4, 148.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.5, -1.1)
Talladega County 5 fallingfalling higher 93 153.7 (139.6, 169.0) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Walker County 5 fallingfalling higher 77 149.6 (134.5, 166.2) 1.2 -2.1 (-7.0, -0.4)
Barbour County 6 stablestable similar 27 144.6 (119.8, 173.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Bullock County 6 stablestable similar 10 137.3 (99.9, 185.9) 1.1 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Butler County 6 stablestable similar 21 134.8 (108.8, 165.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Chilton County 6 stablestable similar 41 132.0 (114.3, 152.1) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Choctaw County 6 stablestable similar 14 114.3 (88.2, 147.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Clay County 6 stablestable similar 16 137.9 (108.3, 174.3) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Cleburne County 6 stablestable similar 17 148.7 (118.3, 185.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Coffee County 6 stablestable similar 51 136.8 (120.3, 155.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Conecuh County 6 stablestable similar 13 141.0 (106.8, 184.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Coosa County 6 stablestable similar 11 120.5 (88.9, 162.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Geneva County 6 stablestable similar 30 143.7 (120.8, 170.4) 1.1 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Greene County 6 stablestable similar 10 150.6 (108.5, 205.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Hale County 6 stablestable similar 18 152.7 (121.0, 191.1) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Henry County 6 stablestable similar 20 134.9 (108.7, 166.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Lamar County 6 stablestable similar 17 148.4 (117.3, 186.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Lawrence County 6 stablestable similar 34 135.9 (115.6, 159.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Lowndes County 6 stablestable similar 11 130.7 (96.5, 174.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Marengo County 6 stablestable similar 19 120.3 (96.3, 149.2) 1.0 -16.3 (-34.5, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 stablestable similar 21 127.8 (103.7, 156.7) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Perry County 6 stablestable similar 10 131.4 (94.9, 179.5) 1.0 -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Pickens County 6 stablestable similar 22 144.3 (118.1, 175.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Pike County 6 stablestable similar 30 145.5 (122.5, 171.8) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Randolph County 6 stablestable similar 22 123.4 (100.6, 150.5) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Sumter County 6 stablestable similar 13 147.7 (110.2, 194.6) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Tallapoosa County 6 stablestable similar 47 141.9 (123.2, 163.1) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Washington County 6 stablestable similar 17 136.1 (107.5, 171.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Wilcox County 6 stablestable similar 12 145.9 (109.7, 191.5) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Autauga County 8 fallingfalling similar 53 133.7 (118.0, 151.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Baldwin County 8 fallingfalling similar 222 119.9 (112.7, 127.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Bibb County 8 fallingfalling similar 20 137.8 (111.6, 168.8) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Chambers County 8 fallingfalling similar 35 125.2 (106.5, 146.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Colbert County 8 fallingfalling similar 63 138.1 (122.7, 155.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Cullman County 8 fallingfalling similar 79 119.3 (107.4, 132.3) 0.9 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Dale County 8 fallingfalling similar 49 137.3 (120.3, 156.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Dallas County 8 fallingfalling similar 39 134.1 (115.2, 155.5) 1.1 -4.6 (-16.1, -1.0)
DeKalb County 8 fallingfalling similar 68 136.7 (122.3, 152.5) 1.1 -1.4 (-8.3, -0.3)
Elmore County 8 fallingfalling similar 79 135.3 (122.0, 149.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Escambia County 8 fallingfalling similar 40 146.8 (126.6, 169.7) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Houston County 8 fallingfalling similar 97 123.3 (112.3, 135.2) 1.0 -2.5 (-7.1, -1.1)
Jefferson County 8 fallingfalling similar 639 134.2 (129.5, 139.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Lauderdale County 8 fallingfalling similar 93 124.2 (112.6, 136.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Lee County 8 fallingfalling similar 123 133.3 (122.8, 144.5) 1.1 -2.1 (-6.6, -0.9)
Limestone County 8 fallingfalling similar 81 119.4 (107.9, 131.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Macon County 8 fallingfalling similar 22 139.3 (113.2, 170.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Madison County 8 fallingfalling similar 326 126.9 (120.7, 133.4) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.4, -1.1)
Marshall County 8 fallingfalling similar 89 131.1 (118.9, 144.3) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Montgomery County 8 fallingfalling similar 208 135.5 (127.2, 144.2) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Morgan County 8 fallingfalling similar 123 138.7 (127.7, 150.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-4.4, -0.5)
St. Clair County 8 fallingfalling similar 81 123.6 (111.6, 136.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Winston County 8 fallingfalling similar 26 121.3 (100.7, 146.0) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Shelby County 9 fallingfalling lower 151 100.3 (93.2, 107.9) 0.8 -2.7 (-7.6, -1.6)
Tuscaloosa County 9 fallingfalling lower 152 112.9 (104.9, 121.4) 0.9 -2.2 (-5.7, -1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/24/2025 3:19 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 5.3.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top