Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County (Rural Counties Combined)

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 2 N/A 113.5 (110.8, 116.2) N/A 1,361 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 108.2 (107.6, 108.7) N/A 26,852 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.3)
Noble County 2 Rural 151.7 (109.3, 204.3) 1 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 5.2)
Pike County 2 Rural 145.9 (120.4, 175.1) 2 (1, 32) 23 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.3, 4.5)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 130.5 (116.5, 145.7) 3 (1, 30) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Guernsey County 2 Rural 127.4 (106.7, 150.8) 5 (1, 40) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.4)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 126.9 (106.0, 150.7) 4 (1, 40) 26 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Fayette County 2 Rural 126.8 (103.8, 153.3) 6 (1, 42) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 5.2)
Shelby County 2 Rural 125.9 (107.6, 146.3) 8 (1, 39) 34 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.7)
Jackson County 2 Rural 125.1 (103.7, 149.6) 7 (1, 41) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 10.9)
Gallia County 2 Rural 124.1 (100.9, 151.0) 9 (1, 43) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.6)
Scioto County 2 Rural 123.9 (109.6, 139.5) 10 (1, 36) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-6.4, -0.3)
Adams County 2 Rural 123.9 (100.4, 151.2) 11 (1, 44) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.4, 4.4)
Sandusky County 2 Rural 121.8 (105.5, 139.8) 12 (1, 39) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.1)
Meigs County 2 Rural 120.1 (94.9, 150.1) 13 (1, 45) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.4)
Mercer County 2 Rural 120.0 (100.4, 142.2) 14 (1, 43) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 120.0 (107.0, 134.2) 15 (2, 38) 62 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 120.0 (107.6, 133.4) 17 (2, 37) 69 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Highland County 2 Rural 119.5 (100.9, 140.5) 16 (1, 43) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 119.2 (107.5, 131.8) 18 (3, 36) 77 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)
Huron County 2 Rural 118.8 (102.7, 136.5) 19 (2, 41) 40 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.7)
Ross County 2 Rural 117.8 (104.4, 132.5) 20 (3, 40) 56 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Knox County 2 Rural 117.5 (101.6, 135.2) 21 (2, 42) 39 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Harrison County 2 Rural 117.4 (85.8, 156.8) 22 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.7, 4.2)
Ashland County 2 Rural 116.0 (99.0, 135.0) 23 (2, 43) 34 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 115.2 (82.5, 156.4) 24 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 4.4)
Vinton County 2 Rural 114.5 (82.3, 155.2) 25 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -8.4 (-24.6, 0.0)
Wyandot County 2 Rural 114.0 (89.0, 143.9) 26 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 113.1 (97.2, 130.7) 27 (3, 43) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 1.8)
Logan County 2 Rural 112.7 (95.1, 132.6) 28 (2, 44) 29 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Preble County 2 Rural 109.6 (91.4, 130.3) 30 (3, 46) 26 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Athens County 2 Rural 109.5 (93.7, 127.2) 29 (3, 44) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 109.5 (89.3, 132.7) 31 (3, 46) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.5)
Hardin County 2 Rural 108.0 (86.5, 132.9) 32 (2, 47) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.9)
Crawford County 2 Rural 107.8 (89.7, 128.5) 34 (3, 46) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.4)
Seneca County 2 Rural 106.8 (90.9, 124.5) 35 (5, 46) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Hancock County 2 Rural 106.2 (92.8, 121.1) 33 (7, 44) 45 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Marion County 2 Rural 103.0 (89.2, 118.3) 36 (11, 45) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Champaign County 2 Rural 101.8 (83.6, 122.8) 38 (6, 47) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Auglaize County 2 Rural 101.2 (84.5, 120.2) 37 (9, 47) 26 falling falling trend -3.2 (-17.9, -0.4)
Van Wert County 2 Rural 99.7 (79.1, 123.8) 39 (5, 47) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.4)
Clinton County 2 Rural 97.6 (80.6, 116.9) 40 (11, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.3)
Defiance County 2 Rural 95.3 (77.8, 115.5) 41 (12, 47) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Darke County 2 Rural 93.4 (78.0, 110.8) 42 (18, 47) 26 stable stable trend -3.4 (-16.7, 0.3)
Morgan County 2 Rural 92.8 (64.6, 129.1) 44 (3, 47) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.2)
Henry County 2 Rural 91.7 (71.8, 115.3) 43 (10, 47) 15 falling falling trend -15.2 (-27.8, -9.0)
Williams County 2 Rural 87.0 (70.1, 106.9) 45 (20, 47) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.3)
Holmes County 2 Rural 80.7 (65.3, 98.4) 46 (31, 47) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Paulding County 2 Rural 77.9 (55.9, 105.7) 47 (20, 47) 8 falling falling trend -9.2 (-32.4, -1.2)
Allen County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Ashtabula County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Belmont County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Brown County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Butler County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Carroll County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Clark County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Clermont County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Delaware County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Erie County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Fairfield County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Franklin County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Fulton County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Geauga County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Greene County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Hamilton County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Hocking County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Jefferson County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Lake County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Lawrence County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Licking County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Lorain County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Lucas County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Madison County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Mahoning County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Medina County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Miami County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Montgomery County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Morrow County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Ottawa County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Perry County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Pickaway County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Portage County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Richland County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Stark County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Summit County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Trumbull County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Union County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Warren County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~
Wood County 2 Urban
~
~
~
~
~

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/17/2026 9:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

~ Data not available for this geography and rural/urban combination. New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, and Washington, DC, are all comprised of urban areas. There are no rural data for these states.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top