Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A No 19.6 (19.0, 20.3) N/A 675 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.4)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Gibson County Urban No 30.9 (21.9, 42.3) 1 (1, 37) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Bedford County Rural No 28.7 (18.9, 41.3) 2 (1, 48) 6
*
*
DeKalb County Rural No 28.4 (15.8, 47.2) 3 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Grainger County Urban No 28.4 (16.0, 46.4) 4 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Shelby County Urban No 27.5 (25.1, 30.1) 5 (1, 14) 104 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Rutherford County Urban No 26.0 (21.4, 31.0) 6 (1, 30) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.2)
McNairy County Rural No 25.3 (15.1, 40.2) 7 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Cheatham County Urban No 24.6 (14.7, 38.2) 8 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Carroll County Rural No 24.0 (14.3, 38.2) 9 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Obion County Rural No 23.2 (14.1, 36.3) 10 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Claiborne County Rural No 23.1 (14.0, 36.1) 11 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Bradley County Urban No 22.9 (17.2, 29.7) 12 (1, 47) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Cocke County Rural No 22.8 (14.4, 34.6) 13 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Unicoi County Urban No 22.4 (12.7, 38.3) 14 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Hardeman County Rural No 22.2 (13.0, 36.0) 15 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Lawrence County Rural No 22.2 (14.0, 33.4) 16 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 21.9 (16.8, 28.0) 17 (2, 47) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.3)
Wilson County Urban No 21.9 (16.7, 28.0) 18 (2, 48) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.4)
Washington County Urban No 21.9 (17.3, 27.3) 19 (3, 44) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Coffee County Rural No 21.8 (15.0, 30.7) 20 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 1.1)
Davidson County Urban No 21.8 (19.2, 24.5) 21 (7, 35) 58 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 9.5)
Marshall County Rural No 20.7 (11.4, 34.3) 22 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Robertson County Urban No 20.5 (13.8, 29.2) 23 (2, 53) 7
*
*
Dickson County Urban No 19.9 (12.7, 29.6) 24 (2, 54) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Hamilton County Urban No 19.5 (16.8, 22.6) 25 (11, 44) 39 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Marion County Urban No 19.5 (11.2, 31.9) 26 (1, 54) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -1.0)
Franklin County Rural No 19.4 (12.6, 28.8) 27 (2, 54) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.8)
Carter County Urban No 19.2 (13.5, 26.8) 28 (4, 54) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 19.1 (12.9, 27.5) 29 (3, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.8)
Warren County Rural No 18.9 (11.6, 29.0) 30 (2, 54) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.6)
Greene County Rural No 18.8 (13.5, 25.8) 31 (5, 53) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 18.7 (11.2, 29.5) 32 (2, 54) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.0, -1.0)
Maury County Urban No 18.7 (13.4, 25.3) 33 (5, 53) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Madison County Urban No 18.3 (13.3, 24.7) 34 (6, 53) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Giles County Rural No 18.3 (10.3, 30.4) 35 (1, 54) 3 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.9)
Putnam County Rural No 18.2 (12.5, 25.5) 36 (4, 54) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.5)
Henry County Rural No 18.0 (10.8, 28.7) 37 (2, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.8)
Hamblen County Urban No 17.9 (11.8, 25.9) 38 (3, 54) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.5)
Sumner County Urban No 17.4 (13.6, 21.9) 39 (12, 52) 16 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.2)
Dyer County Rural No 17.3 (10.2, 27.7) 40 (2, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.6)
Sullivan County Urban No 17.1 (13.8, 21.2) 41 (15, 52) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Tipton County Urban No 16.9 (10.8, 25.2) 42 (4, 54) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.2, -2.6)
Williamson County Urban Yes 16.4 (13.1, 20.3) 43 (16, 53) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.2)
McMinn County Rural Yes 16.4 (10.7, 24.3) 44 (6, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Anderson County Urban Yes 16.0 (11.2, 22.3) 45 (10, 54) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.2)
Knox County Urban Yes 15.7 (13.4, 18.2) 46 (25, 52) 35 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.3)
Fayette County Urban Yes 15.7 (9.7, 24.4) 47 (6, 54) 4
*
*
Sevier County Rural Yes 15.2 (10.8, 20.7) 48 (14, 54) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.4)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 14.4 (10.4, 20.0) 49 (19, 54) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.2)
Hawkins County Urban Yes 14.4 (9.2, 21.5) 50 (12, 54) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.3)
Roane County Urban Yes 13.8 (9.2, 20.5) 51 (17, 54) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.2)
Monroe County Rural Yes 13.7 (7.9, 22.2) 52 (11, 54) 4
*
*
Blount County Urban Yes 13.3 (10.0, 17.5) 53 (27, 54) 11 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.3, -2.9)
Loudon County Urban Yes 10.8 (6.9, 16.6) 54 (32, 54) 5 falling falling trend -6.1 (-19.1, -1.0)
Benton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rhea County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 6:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top