Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota | No | 143.8 (142.4, 145.1) | N/A | 9,192 | falling | -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3) |
United States 6 | No | 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) | N/A | 464,265 | falling | -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7) |
Chippewa County | No | 191.0 (162.4, 224.2) | 1 (1, 58) | 36 | stable | 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9) |
Mille Lacs County | No | 186.3 (165.8, 208.9) | 2 (1, 35) | 63 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Wadena County | No | 184.0 (157.9, 213.7) | 3 (1, 58) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
Faribault County | No | 173.8 (148.7, 202.8) | 4 (1, 75) | 40 | stable | 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
Wilkin County | No | 173.5 (136.3, 219.4) | 5 (1, 87) | 16 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Polk County | No | 172.5 (154.8, 191.9) | 6 (1, 55) | 74 | stable | -1.2 (-12.7, 11.8) |
Lincoln County | No | 171.3 (134.0, 217.7) | 7 (1, 86) | 18 | stable | 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6) |
Watonwan County | No | 170.3 (138.5, 208.6) | 8 (1, 84) | 25 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Norman County | No | 169.0 (134.2, 211.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 18 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
Nobles County | No | 168.6 (145.0, 195.9) | 10 (1, 79) | 41 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Sibley County | No | 165.2 (140.4, 193.8) | 11 (1, 81) | 34 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Martin County | No | 164.7 (144.8, 187.2) | 12 (1, 77) | 57 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Brown County | No | 164.4 (145.9, 185.0) | 13 (1, 73) | 66 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Itasca County | No | 161.5 (148.0, 176.1) | 14 (3, 66) | 117 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Le Sueur County | No | 161.3 (143.2, 181.4) | 15 (2, 78) | 60 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
Chisago County | No | 161.2 (147.5, 176.0) | 16 (4, 67) | 106 | stable | 6.2 (-5.2, 19.1) |
Rock County | No | 160.3 (131.5, 194.6) | 17 (1, 86) | 23 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Aitkin County | No | 160.0 (139.5, 183.8) | 18 (1, 82) | 55 | falling | -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
St. Louis County | No | 158.4 (151.6, 165.4) | 19 (9, 49) | 447 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
Goodhue County | No | 158.0 (144.5, 172.6) | 20 (4, 73) | 108 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Meeker County | No | 157.7 (139.1, 178.5) | 21 (2, 81) | 55 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Yellow Medicine County | No | 157.6 (128.9, 191.8) | 22 (1, 87) | 24 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Renville County | No | 157.0 (134.0, 183.7) | 23 (1, 85) | 36 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Mahnomen County | No | 157.0 (107.9, 226.0) | 24 (1, 87) | 8 | falling | -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
Clearwater County | No | 156.4 (125.6, 193.7) | 25 (1, 87) | 19 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
Isanti County | No | 156.3 (140.8, 173.2) | 26 (4, 78) | 77 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1) |
Douglas County | No | 156.3 (142.1, 171.7) | 27 (5, 75) | 97 | stable | -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0) |
Kanabec County | No | 155.6 (133.2, 181.2) | 28 (2, 85) | 37 | falling | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Swift County | No | 155.4 (126.5, 190.1) | 29 (1, 87) | 23 | falling | -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
Morrison County | No | 155.3 (139.6, 172.6) | 30 (4, 80) | 76 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Cass County | No | 154.6 (138.3, 172.8) | 31 (4, 81) | 76 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Pine County | No | 153.8 (137.6, 171.8) | 32 (5, 81) | 69 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4) |
Crow Wing County | No | 153.8 (142.8, 165.4) | 33 (8, 71) | 159 | falling | -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
Traverse County | No | 153.7 (113.4, 210.7) | 34 (1, 87) | 11 | stable | -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9) |
Grant County | No | 153.4 (116.4, 199.9) | 35 (1, 87) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Pipestone County | No | 153.2 (125.3, 186.9) | 36 (1, 87) | 23 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
Winona County | No | 153.0 (139.1, 168.0) | 37 (7, 79) | 96 | falling | -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
Cottonwood County | No | 152.2 (127.7, 181.4) | 38 (2, 86) | 30 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3) |
Benton County | No | 151.8 (135.6, 169.4) | 39 (4, 82) | 68 | falling | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
Fillmore County | No | 151.1 (131.9, 172.6) | 40 (4, 85) | 50 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Hubbard County | No | 150.6 (132.2, 171.4) | 41 (4, 84) | 55 | falling | -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
Kittson County | No | 150.1 (112.7, 199.5) | 42 (1, 87) | 12 | stable | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4) |
Anoka County | No | 150.1 (144.3, 156.0) | 43 (22, 65) | 539 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
Big Stone County | No | 149.5 (115.8, 193.2) | 44 (1, 87) | 15 | falling | -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8) |
Koochiching County | No | 149.3 (126.4, 176.4) | 45 (2, 87) | 34 | falling | -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
Wright County | No | 149.3 (140.0, 159.0) | 46 (16, 74) | 198 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
Freeborn County | No | 149.0 (133.2, 166.6) | 47 (7, 83) | 73 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Mower County | No | 149.0 (134.2, 165.2) | 48 (8, 83) | 82 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Sherburne County | No | 148.3 (136.7, 160.6) | 49 (12, 80) | 129 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
Lyon County | No | 146.0 (127.0, 167.2) | 50 (5, 87) | 46 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
Lake County | No | 146.0 (122.0, 174.6) | 51 (2, 87) | 30 | falling | -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9) |
Clay County | No | 145.9 (132.8, 160.0) | 52 (13, 83) | 96 | falling | -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1) |
Rice County | No | 145.8 (133.6, 158.9) | 53 (14, 83) | 111 | falling | -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
Kandiyohi County | No | 145.6 (131.1, 161.6) | 54 (10, 85) | 83 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6) |
Becker County | No | 145.4 (130.4, 162.1) | 55 (9, 84) | 72 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Wabasha County | No | 145.3 (127.5, 165.4) | 56 (6, 86) | 50 | falling | -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5) |
Stearns County | No | 145.2 (137.2, 153.5) | 57 (24, 77) | 260 | falling | -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7) |
Waseca County | No | 144.7 (123.8, 168.6) | 58 (5, 87) | 36 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
Carlton County | No | 144.4 (129.1, 161.3) | 59 (10, 85) | 67 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Red Lake County | No | 143.9 (104.1, 197.2) | 60 (1, 87) | 9 | stable | -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
Pennington County | No | 143.7 (119.9, 171.3) | 61 (4, 87) | 28 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Blue Earth County | No | 142.7 (130.2, 156.2) | 62 (15, 84) | 101 | falling | -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8) |
Ramsey County | No | 142.7 (138.0, 147.5) | 63 (38, 74) | 742 | falling | -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6) |
Stevens County | No | 142.4 (112.0, 179.3) | 64 (2, 87) | 17 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
Beltrami County | No | 140.8 (126.0, 157.1) | 65 (13, 86) | 70 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
Redwood County | No | 140.8 (119.1, 165.9) | 66 (5, 87) | 33 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
Lake of the Woods County | No | 140.7 (100.2, 196.5) | 67 (1, 87) | 9 | stable | -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4) |
Jackson County | No | 140.6 (114.5, 172.0) | 68 (3, 87) | 23 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
Washington County | No | 140.5 (134.2, 147.1) | 69 (37, 79) | 388 | falling | -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
Cook County | No | 140.4 (105.4, 187.4) | 70 (1, 87) | 13 | stable | -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3) |
Marshall County | No | 140.1 (113.7, 171.9) | 71 (4, 87) | 22 | falling | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Lac qui Parle County | No | 139.2 (107.7, 179.1) | 72 (2, 87) | 17 | falling | -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6) |
Dodge County | No | 139.0 (118.1, 162.8) | 73 (7, 87) | 32 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0) |
Otter Tail County | No | 138.7 (128.0, 150.2) | 74 (28, 85) | 140 | falling | -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
Scott County | No | 138.4 (128.8, 148.4) | 75 (31, 84) | 165 | falling | -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
McLeod County | No | 137.6 (123.3, 153.4) | 76 (18, 87) | 70 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Dakota County | No | 137.4 (132.4, 142.6) | 77 (50, 81) | 594 | falling | -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2) |
Steele County | No | 136.2 (121.6, 152.4) | 78 (18, 87) | 66 | falling | -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
Nicollet County | No | 135.2 (119.3, 152.7) | 79 (19, 87) | 55 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
Hennepin County | No | 133.5 (130.5, 136.5) | 80 (62, 82) | 1,618 | falling | -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8) |
Roseau County | No | 132.8 (111.1, 158.0) | 81 (10, 87) | 28 | falling | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
Pope County | No | 130.5 (106.3, 159.4) | 82 (9, 87) | 24 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3) |
Houston County | No | 129.1 (110.5, 150.5) | 83 (18, 87) | 38 | falling | -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
Olmsted County | No | 128.0 (120.5, 135.9) | 84 (60, 87) | 225 | falling | -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4) |
Carver County | No | 123.6 (113.6, 134.2) | 85 (62, 87) | 121 | falling | -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1) |
Murray County | Yes | 122.4 (98.2, 152.7) | 86 (14, 87) | 19 | stable | -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1) |
Todd County | Yes | 121.8 (106.0, 139.7) | 87 (43, 87) | 47 | falling | -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 10:49 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 10:49 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.